<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former DEA Directors Want Obama to Ignore the Will of the Electorate on Pot Legalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/</link>
	<description>Legalize marijuana</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:45:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: washunate</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7123</link>
		<dc:creator>washunate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7123</guid>
		<description>right on...I was hoping it was sarcasm, but I&#039;m thinking trollery is more likely as I&#039;ve read some other comments (or at least, embarrassing ignorance).

Which still amuses me that people think FDL can be trolled. This is a place where people actually advocate what they believe, not just worship the whims of the power structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right on&#8230;I was hoping it was sarcasm, but I&#8217;m thinking trollery is more likely as I&#8217;ve read some other comments (or at least, embarrassing ignorance).</p>
<p>Which still amuses me that people think FDL can be trolled. This is a place where people actually advocate what they believe, not just worship the whims of the power structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sapphirebulletsofpurelove</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>sapphirebulletsofpurelove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>This is unadulterated bullshit. But what else should I expect from a &quot;liberal&quot; who thinks drone bombings are awesome but pot is a scourge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unadulterated bullshit. But what else should I expect from a &#8220;liberal&#8221; who thinks drone bombings are awesome but pot is a scourge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washunate</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7097</link>
		<dc:creator>washunate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7097</guid>
		<description>Letters like this are really valuable because they destroy the lie that the Administration can&#039;t do anything.

On drug policy, the President is the only actor that counts - Congress and Republicans simply are not an obstacle &lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letters like this are really valuable because they destroy the lie that the Administration can&#8217;t do anything.</p>
<p>On drug policy, the President is the only actor that counts &#8211; Congress and Republicans simply are not an obstacle <em>at all</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveMoore</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>It is far too complicated to write here, but it all started with Prigg. Of course the Dred Scott Decision, the primary law concerning returning slave property from a Free State, was what angered the North. Fifteen years prior to the Civil War (I&#039;m excluding SC&#039;s Nullification here) saw much action by anti-slavery citizens. On numerous occasions anti-slavery posses killed US Marshalls--only to be acquitted in court. Just look at the history of Kansas and armed gangs that &quot;kidnapped&quot; slaves from Missouri. What I am stating is look at the LEGAL reactions by anti-slavery in fighting draconian federal punishments. The Free States eventually found LEGAL means to trump federal laws, sometimes along with civil disobedience when federal agents showed up. I wrote about it decades ago. PLEASE think outside the box, and I don&#039;t mean that insultingly. When local police start arresting federal agents for not complying with state law, Holder and the DEA will realize they don&#039;t have enough agents to go around. They will also realize they don&#039;t have enough US Attorneys and AUSAs to go around fighting a continuous stream of state lawsuits. Congressmen will have to side with their constituents or lose the next election. Maybe 15 anti-Drug War states will threaten to secede from repressive federal laws. It happened once, so it can happen again. At least I am optimistic it could. And wouldn&#039;t that be rich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is far too complicated to write here, but it all started with Prigg. Of course the Dred Scott Decision, the primary law concerning returning slave property from a Free State, was what angered the North. Fifteen years prior to the Civil War (I&#8217;m excluding SC&#8217;s Nullification here) saw much action by anti-slavery citizens. On numerous occasions anti-slavery posses killed US Marshalls&#8211;only to be acquitted in court. Just look at the history of Kansas and armed gangs that &#8220;kidnapped&#8221; slaves from Missouri. What I am stating is look at the LEGAL reactions by anti-slavery in fighting draconian federal punishments. The Free States eventually found LEGAL means to trump federal laws, sometimes along with civil disobedience when federal agents showed up. I wrote about it decades ago. PLEASE think outside the box, and I don&#8217;t mean that insultingly. When local police start arresting federal agents for not complying with state law, Holder and the DEA will realize they don&#8217;t have enough agents to go around. They will also realize they don&#8217;t have enough US Attorneys and AUSAs to go around fighting a continuous stream of state lawsuits. Congressmen will have to side with their constituents or lose the next election. Maybe 15 anti-Drug War states will threaten to secede from repressive federal laws. It happened once, so it can happen again. At least I am optimistic it could. And wouldn&#8217;t that be rich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlit</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7095</link>
		<dc:creator>Backlit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7095</guid>
		<description>The former DEA directors continue to live in a fantasy world where the war on drugs is a resounding success. They have to keep up this charade to validate themselves. they will never admit they were wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former DEA directors continue to live in a fantasy world where the war on drugs is a resounding success. They have to keep up this charade to validate themselves. they will never admit they were wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixonclinbushbama</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7094</link>
		<dc:creator>nixonclinbushbama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7094</guid>
		<description>Wiki describes the &lt;em&gt;Prigg &lt;/em&gt; decision as follows:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Prigg&lt;/em&gt; v. &lt;em&gt;Pennsylvania&lt;/em&gt;, 41 U.S. 539 (1842), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Federal Fugitive Slave Act precluded a Pennsylvania state law that gave procedural protections to suspected escaped slaves, and overturned the conviction of Edward Prigg as a result.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In the Prigg case, the Pennsylvania statute was invalidated because it conflicted with the right of return of slaves then guarantied by the Constitution. 

The federal government cannot require states to spend their money on anything, including on enforcing federal law.  However, most law enforcement agencies do cooperate with each other to a degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiki describes the <em>Prigg </em> decision as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Prigg</em> v. <em>Pennsylvania</em>, 41 U.S. 539 (1842), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Federal Fugitive Slave Act precluded a Pennsylvania state law that gave procedural protections to suspected escaped slaves, and overturned the conviction of Edward Prigg as a result.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the Prigg case, the Pennsylvania statute was invalidated because it conflicted with the right of return of slaves then guarantied by the Constitution. </p>
<p>The federal government cannot require states to spend their money on anything, including on enforcing federal law.  However, most law enforcement agencies do cooperate with each other to a degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixonclinbushbama</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator>nixonclinbushbama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7093</guid>
		<description>What are we doing about truck drivers who drink while driving, or who have taken any drug, over the counter or prescription, that specifies that taking it might cause drowsiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are we doing about truck drivers who drink while driving, or who have taken any drug, over the counter or prescription, that specifies that taking it might cause drowsiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixonclinbushbama</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7092</link>
		<dc:creator>nixonclinbushbama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7092</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s sarcasm, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sarcasm, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapier51</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7091</link>
		<dc:creator>rapier51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7091</guid>
		<description>So it&#039;s OK with you if truckers hauling various dangerous chemicals are smoking dope before they hop in the truck?  I know this is an extreme case but where do you draw the line.  Being high on pot reduces the performance of most tasks in probably hard to quantify ways. 

Listen I am playing devils advocate here. No opponent ever mentions this sort of worker performance and safety thing so it&#039;s probably not a factor in their opposition. I think the main opposition  comes from some deep suspicion that somehow pot is subversive to the existing social order and I think that is true. In a minor way maybe but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s OK with you if truckers hauling various dangerous chemicals are smoking dope before they hop in the truck?  I know this is an extreme case but where do you draw the line.  Being high on pot reduces the performance of most tasks in probably hard to quantify ways. </p>
<p>Listen I am playing devils advocate here. No opponent ever mentions this sort of worker performance and safety thing so it&#8217;s probably not a factor in their opposition. I think the main opposition  comes from some deep suspicion that somehow pot is subversive to the existing social order and I think that is true. In a minor way maybe but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixonclinbushbama</title>
		<link>http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2013/03/05/former-dea-directors-want-obama-to-ignore-the-will-of-the-electorate-on-pot-legalization/#comment-7090</link>
		<dc:creator>nixonclinbushbama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/?p=3954#comment-7090</guid>
		<description>Follow the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.217 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-24 10:35:16 -->
